行政院農業委員會-水產試驗所全球資訊網

  • Font Size:S
  • Font Size:M
  • Font Size:L
  • 藍
  • 綠
  • 橙
  • 紫
  • 漁電共生
  • FaceBook
  • 農業創新育成中心
  • YouTube
  • Flickr
  • 觀賞魚網站
  • 水產陳列館
  • 水產食譜

海水繁養殖研究(2003~2006)

  • 書籤: facebook  plurk  funp  twitter 
  • 點閱: 2307
  • 日期: 2019-07-19
海水繁養殖研究(2003~2006)-池水潑灑光合細菌及異營菌對文蛤養成效果之比較-成長、活存、肝醣含量及體成分差異
主題: 池水潑灑光合細菌及異營菌對文蛤養成效果之比較-成長、活存、肝醣含量及體成分差異
摘要:
為了解添加光合細菌(PSB)及異營菌(HB)對文蛤養成效果,而實施本試驗。試驗處理分為不添加活菌的對照組(control)、添加異營菌的HB組、添加光合菌的PSB組及混合添加異營菌和光合菌的PSB-HB組,每組兩重覆。經過7個月的飼育,文蛤收獲之平均體重,以添加光合細菌之PSB組6.17 g最好,其次為添加異營菌之HB組6.05 g及PSB-HB組5.81 g,最差為對照組4.17 g,且四組間有顯著差異(P < 0.05)。但活存率及肥滿度四組沒有差異。有添加活菌的試驗組文蛤蛋白質和脂質含量均高於對照組,文蛤肝醣含量四組間有顯著差異(P < 0.05),以HB組(64.92 mg/100g)和PSB-HB組(63.64 mg/100g)最好,其次為PSB組(50.52 mg/100g),對照組最差(29.82 mg/100g)。在養殖4個月後,對照組水中氨氮明顯高於其他3組,且氨氮濃度高於300 ppb,因此對照組成長較差的原因,可能是因水質不良所引起。
出版日期: 2004/12/31
報告來源:
作者: 周昱翰 黃福銘 黃麗月 丁雲源
卷: 2
期別: 1
頁碼: 1-11
作者 auther(英): Yu-Han Chou, Fu-Ming Huang, Lie-Yueh Hwang and Yun
標題title(英): Effects of photosynthetic bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria on the culture of hard clam (Meretrix lusoria Roding)-growth, survival, glycogen content and body composition
摘要abstract(英): Hard clam (Meretrix lusoria) were reared for 7 months when both photosynthetic bacteria and heterotrophic bacteria (PSB-HB), photosynthetic bacteria alone (PSB), heterotrophic bacteria alone (HB), and neither photosynthetic bacteria nor heterotrophic bacteria (control) were routinely applied to investigate growth, survival, glycogen content, and body composition of clam. Average final individual weight was 6.17, 6.05, 5.81, and 4.17 g for PSB-, HB-, PSB-HB-, and Control-clam, respectively. There was significant differences in individual weight among the treatments but not in survival rate and condition factor. Clam reared with probiotics, (PSB-HB, PSB, and HB) had higher protein, lipid, and glycogen content than the clam of Control. Glycogen content was 64.92, 63.64, 50.52, and 29.82 mg/100g for HB-, PSB-HB-, PSB-, and Control-clam, respectively. After 4 months’ ammonia-N concentration in water of control-pond was greater than 0.3 ppm, higher than that in ponds of other treatments. Control-clam’s poor growth could be attributed to poor water quality.
使用語言: 中文
相關檔案下載 (ODF或PDF): 下載